Among many other things, we spent a few pages on how they should be interviewing. In one part said " Interviews should stop talking to the interviewee, and do not meet the entrevitador narcissistic. "Of course, getting " speak the interviewee " is far more difficult than simply let him speak. We must ensure that the respondent take trust and feel comfortable, and avoid (I think) manipulate in your favor. Most people, facing an interview, adopts a defensive posture that camouflages sympathy. It is normal. Only exhibitionists like to be seen at balls.
Gilbert gave us a lot of documentaries, including this:
The story of a man who failed, refused or was unable to warn the world of a disaster. In this case, yes you do a prosecution, but does Claude Lanzmann film commitment (commitment to truth, not all of you are thinking.) Maurice Rossel, the Swiss official Red Cross, becomes a living thing that happens. Visit a concentration camp and does not perceive anything unusual. No man is a trial Maurice Rossel, but to all who see nothing strange if any. All those who avert their eyes because they are more comfortable and avoids problems.
But of course, not all interviews are individuals or key people in a moment of history. Also disguised promotion interview, the interview with a personality. The first time I heard of Houellebecq was in an interview in "Ajoblanco" . French ended the conversation by saying "I know. I'm a nuisance" . That, along with the other statements, made me interested in "The Elementary Particles" . Book I recommend you not, really. Yes, that's fine, but it is depressing. As I read it in tatters, and then I went to "The Kreutzer Sonata" , this man played with his group in Benicassim and put, I guess, up the ass. Even if you consider yourself hypersensitive, yes I can definitely recommend you.
In this interview, the semi-promotion, we can always find some jewelry
However, public demand made things are a little less serious. This video is from the eighties and television and the audience have changed a lot. Now he seeks more than the guest is a person carefree, open ... Rulfo might not be the person to a prime-time, however interesting it is. someone like Bill Hader, for example, it would fit in this example.
Or even this one ...
The first is an interview with Bill Hader who apart from being my platonic love - which I never met in NY for more than passing time and time again in front of his workplace - is one of the brightest stars of SNL .
The second, an interview with Joaquin Phoenix when he wanted us into believing that the mess had become Majara. I was actually recorded (and promoted in advance) film "I'm Still There" .
In both cases an interview to promote fun, light, and carried with intelligence. All had fun: the audience, the interviewee and interviewer. Not far from "A Vivant Qui Passe" or Shoah , no videointrepretación of "I accuse" , but we can not be serious all day long. Light products also need to when we return to work.
as they do in "The Ant" , where the light is such that it becomes uncomfortable for the interviewee and the public. To the interviewer, it seems, no. Enjoy laughing at some stars who do, will sell thousands of records, charged gold in abundance, will be known even in Shangri-La, and have mansions in LA, but what balls. Are jerks, not speak English! Menudos buds!
Gilbert, we lied. The important thing is entrevitado laugh at. For the LOL
0 comments:
Post a Comment